REVIEW

The Detection of Campylobacter Species in the Carcass and Feces of Chicken Using a Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR)-Based Colorimetric Assay and Gold Nanoparticles: A Review

Seung-Hwan Hong1,https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6614-7281, Jung-Whan Chon2,https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0758-6115, Eun-Ah Jung1https://orcid.org/0009-0002-5756-8070, So-Yeon Kwon1https://orcid.org/0009-0001-7577-6378, Kiwon Han2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1253-7342, Hyun-Ju Kim3https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7784-6121, Hyeon A Jung4https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2386-3119, Kun-Ho Seo1https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5720-0538, Kwang-Young Song4,*https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5619-8381
Author Information & Copyright
1Center for One Health and College of Veterinary Medicine, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea
2Department of Companion Animal Health, Inje University, Gimhae, Korea
3Department of Companion Animal, Bucheon University, Bucheon, Korea
4Department of Companion Animal Health and Department of Pet Industry, Daegu Hanny University, Gyeongsan, Korea

These authors contributed equally to this study.

*Corresponding author : Kwang-Young Song, Department of Companion Animal Health and Department of Pet Industry, Daegu Hanny University, Gyeongsan, Korea, Tel : +82-53-819-1605, Fax : +82-53-819-1273, E-mail : drkysong@gmail.com

© Copyright 2024, Korean Society of Dairy Science and Biotechnology. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Received: Sep 09, 2024; Revised: Sep 19, 2024; Accepted: Sep 19, 2024

Published Online: Sep 30, 2024

Abstract

The conventional methods for detecting Campylobacter generally take more than four days, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays typically require additional instruments to determine the results. Accordingly, there is a need for simpler, more rapid detection methods that can be used to accurately determine the presence or absence of Campylobacter in chicken or environmental samples. As a general strategy, the application of gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) in colorimetric biosensors has been suggested to detect Campylobacter species in chicken carcasses and feces. In this regard, PCR has been utilized to amplify the target gene, and thiolated PCR products are obtained to enhance the sensitivity of the colloidal AuNP biosensor. Following the mixing of colloid AuNPs with the PCR products, the thiolated PCR products bind to the surface of AuNPs, forming AuNP-PCR products. The thiolated PCR products are characterized by an abundant negative charge that enables the AuNPs to maintain a dispersed formation in response to electrostatic repulsion when these products adhere to the AuNPs. This platform enables the detection of a color differentiation in the AuNPs and does not require additional time or a pH-optimization step to facilitate adherence of the thiolated PCR products to the AuNPs. These findings thus indicate that this strategy could provide an efficient detection method based on the color differentiation of AuNPs with reduced experimentation time, cost, and labor.

Keywords: Campylobacter spp.; gold nanoparticle; polymerase chain reaction; chicken carcass; chicken feces

Introduction

Campylobacteriosis is a foodborne disease that causes diarrhea with abdominal pain and in some cases, Guillaine-Barre syndrome, which results in pneumatic failure and serious damage to the nervous system [1]. According to the European Food Safety Authority and the European Center for Disease Prevention and Control, campylobacteriosis was ranked as the most common zoonosis in Europe in 2014, with 214,268 confirmed cases [2]. Likewise, the number of reported cases of human campylobacteriosis was 246,307 in 2016, which represents 66.3 cases per 100,000 individuals [3]. The most-reported species causing campylobacteriosis in humans is Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli, the latter of which has been largely ignored despite the considerable health damage it causes [4]. Contact with live poultry and consumption of raw poultry have been defined as the main routes of Campylobacter infection [4]. Therefore, new rapid detection methods to accurately determine the presence or absence of Campylobacter spp. in chicken or environmental samples are needed [1].

AuNPs were stable, maintaining a red color. When they aggregated, the stable state of AuNPs was interrupted, resulting in a color change to purple or blue. The main point was that AuNPs could be modified by thiolated polymerase chain reaction (PCR) products, which protected AuNPs from salt-induced aggregation [5,6]. Because of this attribute, we modified unique Campylobacter-specific primers including an unlabeled reverse primer and a thiol-labeled forward primer to amplify the target gene [7]. Therefore, thiol-labeled target gene sequence was obtained. After mixing AuNPs with thiolated PCR products, AuNPs were surrounded by a thick layer that consisted of dsDNA. Therefore, this structure tended to change color from red to blue [7]. To obtain a successful result, GNPs need a thick obstacle with plenty of negative charges to prevent their aggregation.

Recently, specific nanoparticles, including silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) and gold nanopartricles (AuNPs), have been widely used as components of new technologies to detect pathogens and hazardous materials using direct or indirect analytes, such as target DNAs, other molecules, or aptamers, which has been carried out in our previous research [810]. When various solutions change from dispersion to aggregation state, specific nanoparticles exhibit significant color change due to their unique optical properties, which can be observed using a UV-visible wave-based spectrophotometer or the naked eye [11,12].

Consequently, Campylobacter is well established as a major source of bacterial foodborne pathogens worldwide. The various symptoms of campylobacteriosis can range from mild to severe both in children and the elderly. This pathogen exists as a cytochrome oxidase-positive, hippurate hydrolase-positive, microaerophilic, curved gram-negative rod that exhibits corkscrew motility. It can infect and be transferred from the intestines of a number of wild and domestic animals, particularly avian species such as poultry. Hence, this review aims to elucidate and discuss the pathogenesis of Campylobacter spp. and to highlight the applicability of biofunctionalized nanoparticles for the rapid detection of foodborne pathogenic bacteria.

Campylobacter Virulence Factors

Virulence mechanisms have not been specifically characterized for Campylobacter spp. due to the lack of pathogenic similarity between campylobacters and other pathogens [13]. Flagella-mediated motility, bacterial adsorption in the intestinal mucosa, invasive ability, and the possibility of toxin production have all been reported as potential virulence factors [13,14].

Additionally, limited information regarding this pathogen has confirmed that flagella are required for intestinal colonization [15]. Invasion causes cellular inflammation that subsequently results in the production of cytotoxins, and this followed by a reduction in the absorptive ability of the intestine. Based on this, Campylobacter are then able to reach the intestinal tract. Moreover, due to the resistance of this pathogen to gastric acids and bile salts, disease severity may also be dependent upon the immune condition of the host [16].

Flagella

Motility, a process that increases under highly viscous conditions, is necessary for the colonization of the small intestine [17]. Additionally, the function of flagella under different chemotactic conditions is critical for bacterial survival in various ecological sites that are encountered within the gastrointestinal area [18].

The flagellum of C. coli consists of two homologous flagellins that include FlaA and FlaB. These are encoded by two flagellin genes that are arranged in tandem. The flaA gene is controlled by the promoter σ28, and the flaB gene is regulated by the dependent promoter σ54 [18]. The flaA gene is regarded as fundamental for the invasion of epithelium, as it is established that a mutation in this gene leads to a truncated flagellar filament composed of flaB that exhibits a severe reduction in its motility. Despite this, a mutation in flaB appears to possess no structural significance compared to the structure of normal flagella [17]. The flaA gene is responsible for the adherence and colonization of the gastrointestinal tract and for invasion of host cells, where it subsequently detains the immune response [18]. It is currently speculated that flagella possess another characteristic (the ability to secrete non-flagellar proteins) that may be involved in the observed virulence phenomenon [15]. C. jejuni possesses a polar flagellum composed of O-linked glycosylated flagellin, which is a two-component system composed of the sensor FlgS and the response regulator FlgR [13].

Chicken Related Campylobacter spp.

Chicken meat is a significant source of proteins, and it is rich in essential amino acids, vitamins, and minerals. Fleshy chicken contains more protein than does the same amount of fleshy roasted beef, and the prices of chicken meat are lower than those of beef or pork [19]. Moreover, chicken by-products are frequently consumed due to their low price, mild taste, and short preparation time. However, the consumption of chicken has resulted in numerous recent outbreaks of chronic campylobacteriosis worldwide in both industrialized and developing countries [20]. Most of these cases occur as a result of touching raw poultry, eating raw or uncooked poultry meat, or cross-contamination from raw to cooked foods [20,21]. According to an observational study in England and Wales, C. jejuni was reported to be responsible for more than 12-fold the number of cases of human campylobacteriosis compared to those caused by C. coli [22].

The intestinal tract of chickens can contain a large amount of Campylobacter spp., and during processing, the intestinal tract may rupture or leak and allow the contents can be transferred to the skin [23]. Campylobacter spp. remain in a liquid layer on the skin and become entrapped within the cervix [24]. The tenacity and survival of Campylobacter spp. Are both promoted by the appropriate microenvironment located on the skin of chickens, and even under frozen conditions or storage at 4°C, Campylobacter spp. can remain in the chicken carcasses [24,25].

A study was performed to investigate the effect of temperature during different seasons on the survival of C. jejuni in poultry. Wills and Murray demonstrated that Campylobacter spp. represented a persistent concern in poultry, particularly during warm months (May through October) [26]. During this period, 87%–97% of the tested samples were positive for C. jejuni. The lowest number of positive samples was confirmed in December (7%) and January (33%) [26].

Application of Biofunctionalized Nanoparticles (NPs)

Nanoparticle technologies have been extensively used for effective and rapid detection of various microorganisms; however, there are a few limitations that can be mitigated or avoided completely by understanding the critical parameters involved in these reactions. This review addresses the primary parameters regarding the fusion technology of nanoparticles and the various biosynthesis methods and provides a reasonable categorization of the current approaches with particular focus on gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and silver nanoparticles (AgNPs) (Figs. 1 and 2).

jmsb-42-3-77-g1
Fig. 1. Mechanism for the process of aggregation of GNP by sodium. Both aggregation and dispersion of GNP are shown (redrawn). Adapted from Jin et al. [37] with CC-BY-NC.
Download Original Figure
jmsb-42-3-77-g2
Fig. 2. Mechanism of an AgNPs based colorimetric sensor for Cu2+ and Mn2+ detection (redrawn).
Download Original Figure

The AgNP- and AuNP-based colorimetric assays can be very efficient and sensitive, particularly for biomolecule identification and the detection of foodborne pathogenic bacteria in environmental samples. In particular, this review highlights the ability to detect pathogens through their coordination with nanoparticle-stabilizing ligands. This review also presents various approaches that are based on label-free aptamers and PCR products to better understand their role as smart sensing devices.

The term “Nanoparticle (NP)” defines any small object ranging in size from 1 to 100 nm that behaves as a unit in regard to its transport and properties. It is established that nanoparticle properties change as a function of particle size, and based on this, these particles can be classified according to their diameter. Thus, ultrafine particles (or NPs) are particles with diameters of between 1 and 100 nm, while fine particles possess diameters of between 100 and 2,500 nm. For tailored applications, NPs can be capped with a variety of anionic and cationic ligands that can range from displaceable small molecules to polymer coatings. The choice of capping ligand depends upon the type of NPs that are used, and these can range from conductive inks to biomedical tools [27].

Among the known nanoparticles, gold and silver NPs (AuNPs and AgNPs) have been widely studied due to their unique optical, electrical, and photothermal properties. AuNPs and AgNPs exhibit unique optical features in well-dispersed solutions, and these features are dependent upon their level of aggregation, a property that is primarily determined by their specific surface plasmon resonance (SPR) profiles [28]. Metal-noble NPs are of a small enough size to confine their electrons and produce quantum effects. This is a key parameter for naked-eye colorimetric sensing applications, as modifications of their surface charge are transformed into a visible color change. Furthermore, NPs also possess very high extinction coefficients that depend primarily upon their size, shape, and inter-particle distance. Such properties enable NPs to compete with analytical techniques such as absorbance or fluorescence spectroscopy. Colorimetric-based assays have been developed based on exploiting the color changes that are associated with the aggregation of metal-noble NPs [29]. Based on their adaptability, high sensitivity, low cost, and versatility, AgNP- and AuNP-based assays have been used to detect metal ions, small molecules, proteins, DNA, and enzymes [27,3033]. AuNPs are often used as sensing elements to develop sensitive, selective, simple, and label-free colorimetric assays [34]. Consequently, the use of NPs as detection agents could be considered as a type of “litmus test” for target molecules [35]. Analytical methods such as high-performance liquid chromatography, electrophoresis, voltammetry, and fluorescence spectroscopy are the preferred approaches for the detection of various macromolecules; however, sensitive, fast, and high-throughput screening methods are still required [27]. NP-based colorimetric methods are rapid and user-friendly detection approaches that can exploit various chemical mechanisms. For example, these methods can be used for the rapid detection of influenza viruses based on the binding between the influenza virus envelope protein hemagglutinin and sialic acid stabilized AuNPs or for high-throughput screening of endonuclease inhibitors [33,36].

In this review, colorimetric approaches that allow for the naked-eye detection of color changes through ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) absorption spectroscopy without fluorescence detection methods are addressed [37]. Accordingly, these methods have been subdivided according to the analytes and NP surface modifications and are not based on the NPs used, as the colorimetric performances of AgNPs or AuNPs are highly similar [38].

Characteristics and Morphology of Gold and Silver Nanoparticles (NPs)

The most commonly used methods for the synthesis of AgNPs and AuNPs involve the reduction of AgCl or AgNO3 and HAuCl4 with sodium citrate and sodium borohydride. According to a previous study, the AuNP mixture was boiled with vigorous stirring in a round-bottom flask fitted with a reflux condenser for approximately 10 min, and a color change from yellow to wine red was observed within seconds [39]. The AuNP solution concentration was calculated following Beer’s law and using the extinction coefficient of 2.7 × 108 M–1 cm–1 at λ 520 nm [40]. For AgNPs, 1% trisodium citrate was added to a 0.3 silver nitrate solution, and the mixture was stirred for 5 min. After the dropwise addition of 1 mM sodium borohydride solution in the dark, the resulting mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The bright yellow AgNPs were filtered through a Millipore syringe (0.45 nm) to remove the precipitate. NPs were then characterized using diffusion light scattering to calculate their hydrodynamic radius in solution or by transmission electron microscopy to describe their morphology.

For colorimetric assays, AgNPs possess certain advantages over AuNPs. Specifically, AgNP extinction coefficients are higher than are those of AuNPs of the same average size; however, AuNPs are more popular. This could be explained by the observation that AgNP functionalization typically leads to their chemical degradation and, thereafter, the AgNP surface can be easily oxidized, thus reducing their stability [41]. Indeed, Mancuso et al. reported that AuNPs are stable for longer than 1 month at room temperature, while AgNPs are stable for only approximately two weeks [42]. This difference may be linked to the different reaction constants of thiolated gold and silver. The high extinction coefficients and distance-dependent optical properties of AuNPs account for the high sensitivity of AuNP-based colorimetric assays. Moreover, color changes can be easily observed by the naked eye, and this makes these particles attractive for use in DNA-related colorimetric assays [34]. The kinetics of DNA adsorption by AgNPs are slower than are those of AuNPs, and they cannot be accelerated by adding salt at neutral pH. This unique property regarding the specific molecular recognition of DNA-related colorimetric assays accounts for the difficulty of attaching DNA to AgNPs at neutral pH [43].

Similarly, AgNPs are good candidates for use as optical sensors based on their ability to display distance-dependent optical properties [36]. Their stability can be improved by producing Ag/Au core-shell NPs that retain the Ag core optical properties. However, oligonucleotide-modified Ag/Au alloy particles are not as stable as are oligonucleotide-modified core-shell particles, as they irreversibly aggregate under comparable conditions. Furthermore, nanoparticles such as nanorods, prisms, and bipyramids exhibit different SPR wavelengths [42]. Therefore, sensing platforms based on the optical properties of AuNPs in combination with the molecular recognition of ligands such as alkyl thiols, antibodies, nucleic acids, and proteins are active areas of research. Mirkin et al. developed aptamer-based colorimetric assays for macromolecules using more stable AuNPs, despite AgNPs exhibiting a greater extinction coefficient [44].

NP colloidal stability can be adjusted by modifying the surface charges that affect electrostatic stabilization, and NP aggregation can be induced through the loss (or screening) of surface charges. When AgNPs and AuNPs are exposed to light, they oscillate in the electromagnetic field of light. This induces a collective coherent oscillation of the conduction band electrons, thus resulting in SPR. The SPR band intensity and wavelength are dependent upon factors that affect the electron charge density on the particle surface. According to Mie’s theory, these factors include the metal type, the particle size, shape, structure, and composition, and the dielectric constant of the surrounding medium [45].

Thus, unmodified AuNPs are red, while AgNPs are blue or maroon due to their specific and size-dependent SPR absorption. The addition of salt to the reaction triggers electrostatic repulsion between negatively charged NPs and antiparticle changes, ultimately resulting in NP aggregation and subsequent specific color and wavelength changes [46]. Hence, by monitoring the changes in absorbance, it is possible to understand the characteristics of the enhanced scattering effect in aggregated NPs compared to that of non-aggregated NPs [47]. Consequently, the band gap energies can also be used to improve the understanding of NP sensing and catalytic properties [48]. The SPR profile is characteristic of NP surface modifications induced by small molecules, metal ions, and bio-macromolecules [49].

Conclusion

The conventional method for detecting Campylobacter spp. requires a lot of experimental time, cost, and labor, and additional analysis through PCR is essential. Above all, a simple and rapid detection method for accurately determining the presence of Campylobacter in environmental samples or chickens is urgently needed. Up to now, the method for detecting Campylobacter spp. in chicken carcasses and chicken feces using AuNPs in a colorimetric biosensor has been known. First, PCR products and colloidal AuNPs are mixed, and then the thiolated PCR products bind to the AuNP surface to form gold nanoparticle-PCR (GNP-PCR) products. This reaction is because the thiolated PCR products have abundant negative charges, so they not only attach well to the AuNPs, but also maintain a dispersed form under electrostatic repulsion. This method provides color differentiation of AuNPs, and has the advantage of not requiring additional time or pH optimization steps for the thiolated PCR products to attach to the AuNPs. Therefore, it is evaluated that this platform will provide an efficient detection method for various food poisoning bacteria.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This paper was supported by the Konkuk University Researcher Fund, 2023.

References

1.

Yang X, Kirsch J, Simonian A. Campylobacter spp. detection in the 21st century: a review of the recent achievements in biosensor development. J Microbiol Methods. 2013;95:48-56.

2.

Eurosurveillance Editorial Team. The European Union summary report on trends and sources of zoonoses, zoonotic agents and food-borne outbreaks in 2010 [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2024 Aug 30]. Available from: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/efsajournal/pub/2597

3.

García-Sánchez L, Melero B, Rovira J. Campylobacter in the food chain. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2018;86:215-252.

4.

Tam CC, O’Brien SJ, Adak GK, Meakins SM, Frost JA. Campylobacter coli: an important foodborne pathogen. J Infect. 2003;47:28-32.

5.

Fu Z, Zhou X, Xing D. Rapid colorimetric gene-sensing of food pathogenic bacteria using biomodification-free gold nanoparticle. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2013;182: 633-641.

6.

Chan WS, Tang BSF, Boost MV, Chow C, Leung PHM. Detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus using a gold nanoparticle-based colourimetric polymerase chain reaction assay. Biosens Bioelectron. 2014;53:105-111.

7.

Hong SH. Gold nanoparticle and PCR-based colorimetric assay for the detection of Campylobacter spp. in chicken carcass and feces [M.S. thesis]. Seoul, Korea: Konkuk University Graduate School; 2021.

8.

Du J, Yin S, Jiang L, Ma B, Chen X. A colorimetric logic gate based on free gold nanoparticles and the coordination strategy between melamine and mercury ions. Chem Commun. 2013;49:4196-4198.

9.

Lv Z, Liu J, Zhou Y, Guan Z, Yang S, Li C, et al. Highly sensitive fluorescent detection of small molecules, ions, and proteins using a universal label-free aptasensor. Chem Commun. 2013;49:5465-5467.

10.

Kim YJ, Kim HS, Chon JW, Kim DH, Hyeon JY, Seo KH. New colorimetric aptasensor for rapid on-site detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli in chicken carcass samples. Anal Chim Acta. 2018;1029:78-85.

11.

Shams S, Bakhshi B, Moghadam TT, Behmanesh M. A sensitive gold-nanorods-based nanobiosensor for specific detection of Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli. J Nanobiotechnol. 2019;17:43.

12.

Du J, Wu S, Niu L, Li J, Zhao D, Bai Y. A gold nanoparticles-assisted multiplex PCR assay for simultaneous detection of Salmonella typhimurium, Listeria monocytogenes and Escherichia coli O157:H7. Anal Methods. 2020;12:212-217.

13.

Dasti JI, Tareen AM, Lugert R, Zautner AE, Groß U. Campylobacter jejuni: a brief overview on pathogenicity-associated factors and disease-mediating mechanisms. Int J Med Microbiol. 2010;300:205-211.

14.

Asakura M, Samosornsuk W, Taguchi M, Kobayashi K, Misawa N, Kusumoto M, et al. Comparative analysis of cytolethal distending toxin (cdt) genes among Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli and C. fetus strains. Microb Pathog. 2007;42:174-183.

15.

Poly F, Guerry P. Pathogenesis of Campylobacter. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2008;24: 27-31.

16.

Zilbauer M, Dorrell N, Wren BW, Bajaj-Elliott M. Campylobacter jejuni-mediated disease pathogenesis: an update. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 2008;102:123-129.

17.

Guerry P. Campylobacter flagella: not just for motility. Trends Microbiol. 2007;15: 456-461.

18.

Jagannathan A, Constantinidou C, Penn CW. Roles of rpoN, fliA, and flgR in expression of flagella in Campylobacter jejuni. J Bacteriol. 2001;183:2937-2942.

19.

Jain D, Prasad KN, Sinha S, Husain N. Differences in virulence attributes between cytolethal distending toxin positive and negative Campylobacter jejuni strains. J Med Microbiol. 2008;57:267-272.

20.

Corry JEL, Atabay HI. Poultry as a source of Campylobacter and related organisms. J Appl Microbiol. 2001;90:96S-114S.

21.

Nadeau É, Messier S, Quessy S. Prevalence and comparison of genetic profiles of Campylobacter strains isolated from poultry and sporadic cases of campylobacteriosis in humans. J Food Prot. 2002;65:73-78.

22.

Friedman CR, Neimann J, Wegener HC, Tauxe RV. Epidemiology of Campylobacter jejuni infections in the United States and other industrialized nations. In: Nachamkin I, Blaser MJ, editors. Campylobacter. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: ASM International; 2000. p. 121-138.

23.

Berrang ME, Buhr RJ, Cason JA, Dickens JA. Broiler carcass contamination with Campylobacter from feces during defeathering. J Food Prot. 2001;64:2063-2066.

24.

Chantarapanont W, Berrang M, Frank JF. Direct microscopic observation and viability determination of Campylobacter jejuni on chicken skin. J Food Prot. 2003;66:2222-2230.

25.

Simmons NA, Gibbs FJ. Campylobacter spp. in oven-ready poultry. J Infect. 1979;1: 159-162.

26.

Willis WL, Murray C. Campylobacter jejuni seasonal recovery observations of retail market broilers. Poult Sci. 1997;76:314-317.

27.

Wu ZS, Zhang SB, Guo MM, Chen CR, Shen GL, Yu RQ. Homogeneous, unmodified gold nanoparticle-based colorimetric assay of hydrogen peroxide. Anal Chim Acta. 2007;584:122-128.

28.

Chegel V, Rachkov O, Lopatynskyi A, Ishihara S, Yanchuk I, Nemoto Y, et al. Gold nanoparticles aggregation: drastic effect of cooperative functionalities in a single molecular conjugate. J Phys Chem. 2012;116:2683-2690.

29.

Schofield CL, Haines AH, Field RA, Russell DA. Silver and gold glyconanoparticles for colorimetric bioassays. Langmuir. 2006;22:6707-6711.

30.

Liu J, Lu Y. A colorimetric lead biosensor using DNAzyme-directed assembly of gold nanoparticles. J Am Chem Soc. 2003;125:6642-6643.

31.

Pavlov V, Xiao Y, Shlyahovsky B, Willner I. Aptamer-functionalized Au nanoparticles for the amplified optical detection of thrombin. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:11768-11769.

32.

Kanjanawarut R, Su X. Colorimetric detection of DNA using unmodified metallic nanoparticles and peptide nucleic acid probes. Anal Chem. 2009;81:6122-6129.

33.

Zhao W, Chiuman W, Lam JCF, Brook MA, Li Y. Simple and rapid colorimetric enzyme sensing assays using non-crosslinking gold nanoparticle aggregation. Chem Commun. 2007;36:3729-3731.

34.

Zhang L, Zhao J, Jiang J, Yu R. Enzyme-regulated unmodified gold nanoparticle aggregation: a label free colorimetric assay for rapid and sensitive detection of adenosine deaminase activity and inhibition. Chem Commun. 2012;48:10996-10998.

35.

Rosi NL, Mirkin CA. Nanostructures in biodiagnostics. Chem Rev. 2005;105:1547-1562.

36.

Lee JS, Lytton-Jean AKR, Hurst SJ, Mirkin CA. Silver nanoparticle−oligonucleotide conjugates based on DNA with triple cyclic disulfide moieties. Nano Lett. 2007;7: 2112-2115.

37.

Jin NZ, Anniebell S, Gopinath SCB, Chen Y. Variations in spontaneous assembly and disassembly of molecules on unmodified gold nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res Lett. 2016;11:399.

38.

Wu G, Dong C, Li Y, Wang Z, Gao Y, Shen Z, et al. A novel AgNPs-based colorimetric sensor for rapid detection of Cu2+ or Mn2+ via pH control. RSC Adv. 2015;5:20595-20602.

39.

Yu Y, Hong Y, Wang Y, Sun X, Liu B. Mecaptosuccinic acid modified gold nanoparticles as colorimetric sensor for fast detection and simultaneous identification of Cr3+. Sens Actuators B Chem. 2017;239:865-873.

40.

Chen Z, Zhang C, Zhou T, Ma H. Gold nanoparticle based colorimetric probe for dopamine detection based on the interaction between dopamine and melamine. Microchim Acta. 2015;182:1003-1008.

41.

Vidal BC Jr, Deivaraj TC, Yang J, Too HP, Chow GM, Gan LM, et al. Stability and hybridization-driven aggregation of silver nanoparticle–oligonucleotide conjugates. New J Chem. 2005;29:812-816.

42.

Mancuso M, Jiang L, Cesarman E, Erickson D. Multiplexed colorimetric detection of Kaposi’s sarcoma associated herpesvirus and Bartonella DNA using gold and silver nanoparticles. Nanoscale. 2013;5:1678-1686.

43.

Zhang X, Servos MR, Liu J. Fast pH-assisted functionalization of silver nanoparticles with monothiolated DNA. Chem Commun. 2012;48:10114-10116.

44.

Mirkin CA, Letsinger RL, Mucic RC, Storhoff JJ. A DNA-based method for rationally assembling nanoparticles into macroscopic materials. Nature. 1996;382:607-609.

45.

Duque JS, Blandón JS, Riascos H. Localized plasmon resonance in metal nanoparticles using Mie theory. J Phys Conf Ser. 2017;850:012017.

46.

Basu S, Jana S, Pande S, Pal T. Interaction of DNA bases with silver nanoparticles: assembly quantified through SPRS and SERS. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2008;321:288-293.

47.

Lee C, Gaston MA, Weiss AA, Zhang P. Colorimetric viral detection based on sialic acid stabilized goldnanoparticles. Biosens Bioelectron. 2013;42:236-241.

48.

Kundu S. Formation of self-assembled Ag nanoparticles on DNA chains with enhanced catalytic activity. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2013;15:14107-14119.

49.

Banerjee V, Das KP. Interaction of silver nanoparticles with proteins: a characteristic protein concentration dependent profile of SPR signal. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2013;111:71-79.